So the pricing model has changed at Linkedin. You may have noticed in searching that you are coming across people whose full name is hidden. That’s the deal now – if you want to see these names you pay for the privilege.
Not that surprising really that a private network should look to make money from its database. Must feel now that they have sufficient footprint (heading for 100m members) to up the anti. Potentially why would they not go the whole hog and charge everyone?
All of this brings us back to the discussion around open standards, open networks, FOAF, semantics, etc. And indeed David Siegel’s ‘The Power of Pull’ and his idea about the ‘persoanal information locker’.
Interesting to see how this plays out. Will Linkedin changes results in slower growth in the network – but greater revenues to the company? Or will this create the opportunity for another player to up their gorwth rate in the marketplace?