Reading this piece in the NY Times would not encourage you. Is this more of the same? Have students so many distractions, such high expectations, that traditional study no longer gets traction as an idea? And have the Universities, in recognition of this, dumbed things down? Or is this simply some distorted thinking of people who are getting ‘long in the tooth’?
We read a great deal now about the importance of collaboration – and that education needs to incorporate plenty of this. The authors have some interesting comments in this respect – collaboration seems to afford students the opportunity to skip what they don’t like or what they find difficult. Perhaps in this we are missing a trick?
Have been reading Macrowikinomics, Rebooting Business and the World – by Don Tapscott and Anthony D. Williams. They include an excellent chapter: Rethinking the University: collaborative learning. I also recently watched Ken Robinson’s excellent animation: RSA Animate – Changing Education Paradigms.
Both the chapter and the book have left me thinking about how we deliver education/ training in the corporate or enterprise environment. Tapscott & Williams and Robinson are arguing for new approaches in education. These changes are being seen, to different degrees, in different educational institutes.
Web 2.0 and social networking platforms have presented wonderful opportunities for business’s to engage in collaborative processes – within their own organisations and, perhaps more importantly, with people and entities outside the enterprise. However is would seem to me that enterprises should now be looking to change their own approaches to education – to increase the collaborative content of corporate education. This would apply both in the case of internally delivered education/ training and training delivered by professional institutes of education.
Do you know of good examples of collaborative education being employed in industry?
So the government published its paper: Knowledge Society Strategy: Technology Actions to Support the Smart Economy.
There is already plenty of comment – on twitter, in the blogs, on the news and there will be more over the next few days. Comments ranging from ‘a lot of waffle’, ‘telling us what we already know’, ‘where’s the meat?’, etc. But buried in the report are enough reference points to show where we’ve been making progress and where we’ve been falling behind.
When I read Friedman’s ‘The world is flat’, listing his concerns about the state of education, engineering in the US, I felt he could have been writing about Ireland. Ironically he references Ireland as a country pulling itself up and leveraging the flatness of the world. However the shortage of maths proficient secondary school leavers is a major concern and cannot be fixed over night.
The topics discussed in the paper are very worthy of attention – and do represent opportunities for Ireland Inc e.g. cloud, green data centres, networking. Delighted to see reference to semantic web – not really that surprising after €25m of government investment.
I just picked out one small detail from the report (p45):
The Government should appoint a high level CTO with the authority to drive cultural change across the many departments and agencies.
I have commented previously on such appointments in the US – within the Obama administration. I would strongly support such an initiative – though she/he will need plenty of support from Mssrs. Ryan and Lenihan.
Interesting to read Paul Rellis (CEO Microsoft Ireland) pushing significant amounts of technology in Education and Health as ways to address much of the problems we have.
Would agree 100% with Paul Rellis’s ideas around uses of digital technology. However seems to me risk putting cart before the horse. First we need a clear vision of what we are looking to achieve, then commitment from those in Health & Education to achieve the vision, commitment from the investor (govt.) in terms of any required investment. The technology bit is not actually that hard – using Microsoft technology, other proprietary technology and open source technology – in any, to be agreed, configuration.
But first let’s set vision, get some commitment and manage the change.