NY Times piece suggesting there is some level of ‘dumbing down’ going on in some Universities
Reading this piece in the NY Times would not encourage you. Is this more of the same? Have students so many distractions, such high expectations, that traditional study no longer gets traction as an idea? And have the Universities, in recognition of this, dumbed things down? Or is this simply some distorted thinking of people who are getting ‘long in the tooth’?
We read a great deal now about the importance of collaboration – and that education needs to incorporate plenty of this. The authors have some interesting comments in this respect – collaboration seems to afford students the opportunity to skip what they don’t like or what they find difficult. Perhaps in this we are missing a trick?
Energy savings must be targeted to make them happen
It has struck me that in most cases of corporates ‘moving to the cloud’ they are left with a certain amount of on-campus technology – and for many good reasons, including file&print, legacy apps not moving to the cloud, specific security concerns. But do the same corporates target the required savings – in terms of reducing the space allocated, the requirement for air-conditioning, decommissioning older servers? William Clifford address this very point in his article in Forbes. Savings do not just happen – they need to be targeted and managed.
How much effort should be invested in monitoring and addressing twitter based criticism.
Interesting piece this morning by Lucy Kellaway: Replying to customers on Twitter is listening gone mad.
Ms. Kellaway references Starbucks’ efforts to respond to twitter criticism. She includes reference to her own tweet going unanswered (for at least 20+ hours).
I presume those attempting to monitor and respond to social networking comment re their business will be inclined to apply some form of the 80/20 rule – e.g. deal with a criticism that appears particularly damaging, deal with a criticism from a perceived influencer. Not really any different to dealing with other forms of criticism. It seems to be perfectly logical that criticism from a person with a large following may have to be dealt with first.
To the broader question – are corporates wasting management and/or other time in monitoring and attempting to deal with social networking type criticism I think not. And I think they have little choice but to monitor, assess, rate, learn, address.
Seems incoming President Obama is considering appointment of a CTO for the US. Not that surprising when you remember how effectively the Obama campaign used technology in the case to the White House. But perhaps we could benefit from following this idea in Ireland – as we look to up our ranking in the R&D world. Undoubtedly we have made real progress in areas such as ROS. However there continune to be opportunities to streamline how the citizen and businesses interact with government.
Could not agree more with this comment why all this talk about cloud services . I think this was all well underway when we experienced the 'dotbomb' failure in 2000/2001. Current economic issues have nothing to do with IT. This time the tools are better, adoption is greater, the MS/google/ amazon race is driving the suppliers, bandwidth is cheaper. The latest releases from MS e.g. www.azure.com are pushing things forward.