Emerging healthcare technologies: not a surprising piece. The focus is on Electronic Health Record (EHR), Cyber security, Accountable Care Organisations, Population Health analytics, Remote care, mobile and wearable technologies.
Mobile, cloud, analytics – all core to developing and delivering effective and efficient healthcare solutions. And, of course, given the current cyber security threats, security is a prerequisite in implementing and expanding dependence on technologies such as cloud and mobile.
Seems that the electronic health record must be a core foundation of making all of this work for the patient, healthcare providers and society at large. We need a way to aggregate, consolidate, cross correlate the data. This will provide better solutions for patients and improved care. But this access for providers to patient data should be controlled by the patient.
I have always thought of security as an enabler rather than a hindrance or obstruction. Cloud and mobile in healthcare make this case. Interestingly i see cloud as offering greater security – with the opportunity to leverage real in-depth security expertise, not necessarily available internally to healthcare providers. And cloud and hosted solutions offer lots of simplifications in supporting mobile access to data.
Much of what we have seen drive data analytics has come out of the mobile/ cloud/ social developments – tracking and analysis of data captured on mobile devices and through end user participation in social platforms. Healthcare is data intensive – with more and more of the data captured electronically and potentially available for analysis. The tools for capturing the data and the tools for storing, analysing and displaying the data have advanced hugely in recent years. Providers who do not have the ability to capture/ analyse/ understand the data will find themselves significantly disadvantaged in competing with other providers and negotiating with buyers of their services (patients, insurers, government, whoever).
Great opportunities for all healthcare providers to improve the quality and relevance of their offerings, the method of delivering their services and to acquire new business remotely -through new healthcare technologies. But the challenges should not be underestimated – traditional models for Information Technology delivery will prevent organisations leveraging the opportunities available. Providers need to be more dynamics, adopt new technologies and new methods of delivery.
Good to see that US push on electronic health records has not gone unnoticed elsewhere.
UK Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, seems to be push adoption of electronic records and alluding to the nonsense which is the current situation. Will be interesting to see whether UK government seeks to push some real pounds sterling behind the initiative.
There have been a lot of scare stories about confidentiality of personal data – privacy of personal health records. The key point is that the records belong to the patient. Must be possible for patients to get better service by having up to date, comprehensive, electronic patient records which they can choose to share with any healthcare provider.
Some interesting debate taking place in the US now that we are in the ‘meaningful use’ phase of adoption – where providers need to demonstrate that the solutions are being used between providers and between providers and patients in a meaningful way.
We should not underestimate the potential complexity of moving this forward – and some of the likely blockers to change. But this should be about improving quality of patient care and making it more efficient for everyone. Should enable providers to provide an improved service.
Just finished reading Brendan Drumm’s account of his experience of leading change in Public Health in Ireland – as head of the HSE from 2005 to 2010: ‘The Challenge of Change – Putting Patients before Providers‘.
Interesting book on a number of counts: good discussion of a major change project, public health is of interest to all of us, provides an insight into implementing change in public sector and poses some interesting questions about the role of politics and politicians and their impact on provision of public services.
He is very forthright on a number of points:
- Patients (ie the public) need to demand change
- Practitioners need to lead the change
- Primary care is at the centre of any effective solution
- We do not need more beds
- Rationalisation of A&E services across the country was the only option – backed up by significantly improved ambulance services
- HSE (and therfore the public) was paying too much for drugs
- The revised consultant contract (80/20 split of public/private) work is the way forward
Was somewhat surprised not to see some more coverage of potential role of technology in enabling and sustaining change e.g. potential benefits of electronic patient records.
Clearly be believes that he has mapped out a way forward for public healthcare, that we have made significant progress during the last five years and that if the curent incumbents stay on message we will see real changes and benefits for patients in years to come.
It will be interesting to see how a number of changes play out:
- Ongoing discussions re consultant contracts e.g. reimbursement; changing role in context of 80/20 arrangements
- Further consolidation of A&E facilities across the country
- Further role out of integrated services
- How will the current Minister for Health drive forward the changes?
Attended the 16th Annual Conference of the Healthcare Informatics Society of Ireland (‘HISI’) today. Excellent keynote from Michael Dowling, President and CEO of the North Shore -LIJ Health System USA.
He made some opening remarks about a number of the key drives for change in the US: consolidation (insurers and providers), budget issues, healthcare reform movement.
WRT to IT he claimed to have seen less progress than he would have expected (given that Healthcare is one of the most technologically advanced industries) – probably because (1) fragmented healthcare industry and (2) lack of great products.
He argues strongly for a subtantial commitment to IT – if providers want to trak outcomes and to manage the continuum of care. He is looking for his investment in IT to generate quality, productivity and efficiency – with better outcomes for the patient.
He had some interesting views on RoI and investment in information technology. Quick RoIs do not occur – and people too often build false expectations. IT will not solve the healthcare cost problems. These are down to technological advancement, democratisation of advertising by pharma, demographics (in 100 years we have added 35 years to the average life), life style/ behaviour (e.g. child obesity). Many of these issues are not being addressed at the right level.
Mr Dowling made a number of other observations:
- need to move from pay for service (ie volume) to pay for value
- IT must be used to connect different providers right across the contuum e.g. hospitasls, socil services, ancillary services
- important to implement systems which do notlock people into doing what they are doing today
Finally Mr Dowling reminded all of us about the risks of losing the human factor though over dependence on technology. He expressed his frustration tihw so much unproductive email (referecing the quote ‘the problem with communication is thinking it has occurred’).
Al in all an excellent key note from a CEO committed to investing in information technology to improve patient outcomes. And a CEO who is very upbeat – in spite of the current economic challenges in all markets.
Returning again to the subject of privacy – this time in the case of healthcare.
Interesting paper produced in the US by the Patient Privacy Rights group – the case for informed consent.
Paper references interesting statistics about the number of patients now demanding privacy – in fact the number of patients avoiding early medical checkups/ treatment because of concerns re privacy/ confidentiality.
The paper pushes a very valid principle – that the medial data about the patient belongs to the patient and not the hospital or clinician. Therefore it is not sufficient to think about patient privacy being addressed by software vendors.
The paper outlines it as follows: It is a mistake to design health IT in a paternalistic manner — assuming a corporation, vendor, provider or government agency knows what is best for each individual patient. Instead, we should build ‘patient-centric’ health IT systems.
The challenges posed are potentially complex – but they need to be addressed. For operators they will require changes in processes and systems. But these changes will be required to meet legal requirements and in order to establish and maintain credibility with patients.
Like many others I struggle to get out and take exercise on a regular basis. I have many false starts (or false dawns). May target to walk four times a week – or run twice a week; generally do well for a week or two, then let it slip (early morning meeting, bad weather, travelling for work, any excuse will do…).
Was thinking about some application which would (1) assist me in tracking my efforts and (2) put me in touch with similar ‘athletes’ or ‘would be athletes’.
And then, via a contact on facebook, I come across dailymile
Have to say – looks like a close fit to what I think I need. Some nice features including (1) setting out routes and measuring them and (2) summary analytics.
Will report back after a few weeks of use of the site – looking to use this social network (connected to facebook and twitter) to assist me in becoming more healthy.
Interesting to read Paul Rellis (CEO Microsoft Ireland) pushing significant amounts of technology in Education and Health as ways to address much of the problems we have.
Would agree 100% with Paul Rellis’s ideas around uses of digital technology. However seems to me risk putting cart before the horse. First we need a clear vision of what we are looking to achieve, then commitment from those in Health & Education to achieve the vision, commitment from the investor (govt.) in terms of any required investment. The technology bit is not actually that hard – using Microsoft technology, other proprietary technology and open source technology – in any, to be agreed, configuration.
But first let’s set vision, get some commitment and manage the change.
Great presentation illustrating the trends in healthcare spending in the US – up to 2007. Includes one slide comparing with a number of other countries – including UK.
Brought to my attention by @endamadden on twitter.
Do we have similar information available for Ireland?
Interesting post on project healthdesign: The Doctor’s Role in a Health 2.0 World.
Describing the patient as the ceo for his own body ie he takes responsibility, while the doctro is described as the consultant – advising the patient, seems like a good model, which reinforces the idea that the patient needs to manage his own lifesytyle, etc.
The other interesting obeservation relates to the general ‘information overload’ being experienced by all of us in all walks of life. It is quite possible that a patient may know a great deal more about his specific condition than the doctor providing the advice. However the doctor hopefully brings a broader picture and understanding. Seems no reason why the patient and doctro should not collaborate in advaincing the situation. Of course this does tend to turn the more traditional doctor/ patient model on its head.