Have been thinking recently about how we structure a one hour football coaching session as against we run many of our business meetings.
The coaching session – potentially 3 or 4 coaches working with 40 players. In advance we agree session objectives and roles to be undertaken by each coach in the session. Perhaps open with 15 mins of warm up and stretching, move to three or four bases – rotate the players through the bases and close out with two mini games – probably with rules/ scoring systems altered to emphasise a particular skill.
We seek to ensure that players enjoy the sessions, that skills are developed and/or tested, that we simulate match situations. We promote fairness, safety, creativity.
For a meeting may have 4-8 participants, a pre circulated agenda and pre circulated minutes of previous meeting. Probably also allocate one hour for the meeting. We spend 15 mins working though previous minutes and action lists, leaving 45 minutes to address the items listed on the agenda. In theory the meeting should be a lot easier – smaller numbers, advance communication of what will be happening. But, in my experience the meetings are no where nearly as successful as the one hour coaching sessions. Why?
Unfortunately many meetings are not focused – what is the objective (or are the objectives) of the meeting? Why are we meeting? Do we accomplish our objectives?
The football session will start on time and finish on time. Players will be active and play many roles. Players will be tested. Players will learn. Many meeting start late, run late, are dominated by longwinded contributions from those who ignore (possibly do not understand) the purpose of the meeting. and there is no coach to ‘spot and fix’.
I think members of committees who meet on a regular basis have a lot to learn from well structured football (or other sport) coaching. Meetings need to be born again in many orgnisations.
Pinterest meets a user requirement not served by Facebook or Twitter
Just starting using Pinterest.
My initial forays remind me a little of when I started with twitter – why am I doing this? But Pinteret looks like it is gathering traction fast. Interesting to see that there continues to be room in the web2.0 world for new applications, new platforms. Twitter, Facebook, FourQquare do not service this market. They may integrate but the founders of Pinterest have found a new angle, a platform allowing users to interact in a different way.
Karlin Lillington’s review in the Irish Times provides an interesting perspective on the emergence of Pinterest.
I have worked with a number of different enterpreneurs over the years – in very different sectors (High tech, Catering, Engineering, Pharma). What distinguished them from others?
The majority had worked for someone else, had seen something they thought they could do better and had the self belief and energy to get out and try to do it for themselves. Some succeeded, some failed in their venture but most of them are back doing the next one. They may have had to regroup, take a job, find some time to catch up with the family, but they are looking to get back in the game.
Read David Rowan’s piece about the Paddy Cosgrave F.ounders events. Have attended a number of Paddy’s events and rubbed shoulders with, chatted with, listened to various entrepreneurs. Interesting the Rowan references some ideas around the fostering of enterpreneurs – families encouraging kids down certain paths. I suppose this is not really that surprising – when I see the number of excellent sports people who have been started early by their parents. Why would this not apply in business/ development of entrepreneurs.
Attended a seminar last night about preventing injury in sport – by identifying imbalances/ weaknesses in sports people early on and looking to rebalance these. I wonder does this potentially have application in business?
At the end of the day I do believe it has to be in your heart, in your makeup. So many people see things they could do better but for any number of reasons choose to focus on something else. However education and development systems which encourage people to think through alternatives, think about how they might develop/ implement the alternatives, will help foster entrepreneurs.